It's January, the "New Year New You" month for improving your health, exercising more and losing weight. Unfortunately, 95% will give up on their New Year's resolution by March 1st. Why do so many people experience failure on their pathway to wellness? The word diet is derived from the Greek word diatia, which means “way of living.” Sadly, most people think the definition of diet means counting calories, drinking meal-replacement shakes, and taking a handful of the latest weight-loss pills. These things only bring temporary results because they haven’t addressed the real meaning of the word diet.
On my radio show, I’ve been asked to weigh in and throw down the gauntlet on which diet works and which philosophy is most sound. What I have to say is, “They ALL work!” Whether it’s eating for your blood type, Atkins, Paleo, Keto, South Beach, Vegan, Nutrisystem, Weight Watchers, or any variation that exists now or in the future, if you stick to the program, you will experience weight loss… initially.
One of the main reasons why so many different diets work is because they all have one thing in common—they change a person’s routine. They all promote eating different foods in different ways at different times. Whether it’s eating grapefruits, eating steak every day, counting calories, changing your portion sizes, or going 100 percent vegan, when you mix up your daily routine, you will alter your metabolism and change your blood glucose levels and your body’s pH, which in turn, can lead to a weight loss. Unfortunately, most of the time, the results are just temporary.
If you’ve tried one of the many hundreds of weight-loss plans or followed a fad diet, you know this to be true. The majority of you lost the most weight in the first thirty days, continued to lose weight in month two, and only lost a minimal amount of weight after day ninety. By the fourth month, you reached a plateau and became frustrated, which made you walk away from the diet you were on that “was” working. What are you supposed to do then? Continue buying tickets to ride a merry-go-round of fad diets and make the same New Year’s resolution next year and the year after that? Changing your routine leads to initial weight loss, but changing your lifestyle will bring permanent weight loss. In my new book, Food Sanity, how to eat in a world of fads and fiction, I set the record straight and show you how to finally lose weight and keep it off! I reveal the obstacles of permanent weight loss, and they have nothing to do with a lack of exercise.
Obesogens: the Environmental Link to Obesity
If you eat healthy and exercise and still have a hard time losing weight, it could be because you’re being exposed to obesogens. These are chemicals, either natural or man-made, that take control of your metabolic systems, causing weight gain. They come from compounds found in certain plastics; in pesticides and fungicides; in soy and sweeteners; and in the hormones that are injected into our livestock. These obesogens increase appetite and disrupt normal development and lipid metabolism, all of which can lead to obesity. They create an imbalance of hormones such as growth hormone, insulin, and cortisol. People exposed to obesogens may also suffer from a deficiency or change in the ratio between androgen and estrogen sex steroid levels, which normally modifies the fat balance in the body. This can lead to lowered growth hormone secretion, unbalanced cortisol levels, and increased resistance to insulin. Obesogens can be found in makeup, water bottles, nonstick pans, microwave popcorn, and even your shower curtain. In fact, the average person is exposed to over 100 obesogens every day! Additionally, obesogens have been correlated with heart disease, diabetes, obesity, and high cholesterol.
The Most Common Obesogens
High-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) is a leading cause of obesity, especially in children. This is the most common food and drink sweetener on the market. This obesogen wreaks havoc on the insulin and appetite regulating hormones; fooling you into thinking you’re hungry, even if you are not. This increase in appetite leads to fat production. HFCS is cheaper than sugar, thanks to the government’s farm bill corn subsidies. Products with HFCS are sweeter and cheaper than products made with cane sugar. This allows the average soda size to go from 8 ounces to 20 ounces with no additional costs to the manufacturers. In June 2004, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism showed that ghrelin, the hormone that makes you feel hungry and tells you to eat, was not suppressed after eating HFCS. In May 2009, the Journal of Clinical Investigation showed that participants assigned to a high-fructose drink gained more visceral fat compared to the group with a high-glucose drink. In other words, a high fructose intake is more likely to create abdominal fat than sugar. Abdominal fat, is considered the most dangerous fat because it’s associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases.
Bisphenol-A (BPA), a synthetic estrogen primarily used to harden plastics, has been shown to increase insulin resistance. BPA is found in plastic food and beverage containers, canned foods, baby formulas, bottle tops, and water supply lines. Some dental sealants and composites also contain BPA. The United States produces 6 billion pounds of BPA annually, and it’s detectable in 93 percent of Americans. This chemical is also found in thermal paper items including receipts, event and cinema tickets, labels, ATM receipts, and airline tickets. If you put one of these receipts in your wallet and it makes contact with money, this causes a dramatic increase in the concentration of BPA on your currency; making the paper money you handle a secondary source of exposure.  That means you are getting a dosage of the female hormone estrogen from your money. In addition to the BPA being linked to health problems such as various cancers and infertility, it has also been shown to be a major conitributor to the obesity epidemic.  Pregnant woman should never touch their eyes, nose, or mouth after handling these thermal-paper products! The American Chemistry Council petitioned the FDA to phase out the chemical from plastic baby bottles due to the health dangers associated with ingesting the chemical. In July 2012, the FDA finally made it official: BPA can’t be used in plastic baby bottles and cups.
Pesticides used to destroy pests that feed on fruits and vegetables are linked to obesity, diabetes, and other morbidities. The average American is exposed to ten to thirteen pesticides every day, and 90 percent are endocrine disrupters, which have been linked to obesity.
Pharmaceutical drugs can contain obesogens. Some antidepressants, known as selective seratonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), are linked to causing obesity because they affect food intake and lipid accumulation, which leads to obesity. Actos, Avandia, and Thiazolidinedione are diabetic drugs that improve insulin sensitivity but also make people fat.
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) is a surfactant used in nonstick cookware. PFOA has been detected in the blood of more than 98 percent of the general U.S. population. It is a potential endocrine disruptor linked to obesity. Avoid all pots and pans that are coated with a nonstick material.
Hormones such as estrogen, progesterone, and testosterone are being used to increase the weight of cattle. When you eat the cattle, these same substances can increase the weight in YOU! A study in the International Journal of Obesity from researchers at ten different universities, including Yale University School of Medicine and Johns Hopkins University, found that the use of steroid hormones in meat production and on conventional dairy farms could be contributing to obesity. 
Antibiotics in chicken and farmed fish. Because chicken and farmed fish are kept in small pens/cages, antibiotics are often used to help them fight off infection and grow larger. These antibiotics are obesogens.
Exercise Makes Losing Weight Difficult!
More people join a gym in January than all the other eleven months combined! The truth is exercise is important and necessary for a healthy body, but if you want to lose weight, changing your diet is far more effective. It takes five hundred jumping jacks to burn off 100 calories. However eliminating one soda subtracts 150 calories. Which has a greater impact? Considering the average person consumes three to five sodas every day, it seems pretty obvious that you can’t spend every day doing four thousand jumping jacks to erase your lousy dietary choices.
Have you noticed, the more you exercise, the hungrier you get? That’s because exercise actually stimulates hunger! This causes you to crave more food and eat more, which in turn, negates the weight-loss benefits of exercise. The truth is, exercise makes losing weight more difficult! In 2009 the peer-reviewed journal PLoS ONE, published a study of overweight women who didn't exercise regularly. Women were placed into four groups. Three of the groups were asked to work out with a personal trainer, for six months. Women in the fourth group were the controls—they maintained their normal daily activity routines and did not exercise. None of the women in any of the groups changed their dietary habits. Those who exercised with a trainer several days a week for six months did not lose more weight than the control subjects did. In fact, the study found that most of the women who exercised ate more than they did before they started the experiment. Those who exercised intensively with a trainer lost less weight because because they didn't change their eating habits.
The Journal of Obesity Research published a study conducted by a Columbia University team, which showed a pound of muscle burns approximately six calories a day in a resting body, compared to two calories that a pound of fat burns. This means that if you worked out enough to burn off 10 pounds of fat, you would be able to eat only an extra forty calories per day, about the amount in a teaspoon of butter, before beginning to gain the weight back. So, if after a vigorous workout you drank a 20-ounce bottle of Gatorade (130 calories), your hard workout would be futile because the caloric expenditure from the workout and your caloric intake becomes a wash. As you can see, because your body is starving after a workout, a vicious cycle ensues. That old wives’ tale “lose weight by burning more calories than you eat” is wrong. No matter how many jumping jacks you do or how long you ride that stationary bike, exercise alone simply will not work! That’s why exercise is not on my top three ways to lose weight.
Fad diets come and go, but the most popular diet of the last century is calorie counting. It’s become the standard methodology for people wanting to lose weight. But even as far back as 1924, prominent medical doctor Dr. Phillip Norman questioned the value of calorie counting, “The conception of the calorie has retarded logical and rational reasoning in regard to diet, more so than any single other factor.” The problem with a calorie-counting diet is that it can put your body into a “famine” mode that causes you to gain back your original weight and sometimes even more. This is why calorie-counting diets are often referred to as “yo-yo diets.” By definition, a calorie is a measurement of heat. It’s the amount of heat required to raise the temperature of one kilogram of water through one degree Celsius. A calorie is heat! If heat caused weight gain, everyone living at the southern hemisphere would be obese. But actually they’re leaner.
The biggest calorie-counting organization in the world is called Weight Watchers. They’ve been having people count calories for more than fifty years! Interestingly in 2011 David Kirshaw, CEO of Weight Watchers, said in a Time magazine interview, “Calorie counting has become unhelpful. When we have a 100-calorie apple in one hand and a 100-calorie pack of cookies in the other, to view them as being ‘the same’ makes no sense.” For Weight Watchers to make a statement like that really puts into perspective the lack of success calorie counting has when it comes to losing weight and keeping it off. Calorie counting diets simply do not work! It also means having to become a mathematician and that takes the enjoyment out of eating. If you eat wholesome foods, you don’t have to count calories.
In my new book Food Sanity, how to eat in a world of fads and fiction, I share how to get healthy and permanently shed those unwanted pounds. Order your copy today, just for the health of it! Proceeds from every book go to Feeding America Org to help their hunger relief efforts. Plus, as a thank you, I will send you 5 free gifts worth over $300. The book costs less than a large pizza, and I’ll cover the shipping and handling. Get your copy at www.FoodSanity.com
Make 2018 the year you finally achieve your optimal weight.
 Björntorp, P. 1997. “Body Fat Distribution, Insulin Resistance, and Metabolic Diseases.” Nutrition 13 (9): 795–803.
 “Chemicals in Food Can Make You Fat.” CBS News. February 11, 2010 http://www.cbsnews.com/news/chemicals-in-food-can-make-you-fat/.
 Stanhope, K. L. 2012. “Role of Fructose-Containing Sugars in the Epidemics of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome.” Annu. Rev. Med. 63: 329–43.
 Teff, Karen L., et al. 2004. “Dietary Fructose Reduces Circulating Insulin and Leptin, Attenuates Postprandial Suppression of Ghrelin, and Increases Triglycerides in Women.” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism June. 89 (6): 2963-2972.
 Stanhope, Kimber L., et al. 2009. “Consuming Fructose-Sweetened, Not Glucose-Sweetened, Beverages Increases Visceral Adiposity and Lipids and Decreases Insulin Sensitivity in Overweight/Obese Humans.” J Clin Invest 119 (5): 1322–34. doi: 10.1172/JCI37385. Epub 2009 Apr 20.
 Raloff, Janet. 2009. “Concerned about BPA: Check Your Receipts.” Science News, October 7. Accessed May 10, 2016.
 Tavernise, Sabrina. 2012. “F.D.A. Makes It Official: BPA Can’t Be Used in Baby Bottles and Cups.” The New York Times, July 17.
 Liao, C., and K. Kannan. 2011. “High Levels of Bisphenol A in Paper Currencies From Several Countries, and Implications for Dermal Exposure.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 (16): 6761–8.
 Vom Saal, F. S., and S. C. Nagel, et al. 2012. “The Estrogenic Endocrine Disrupting Chemical Bisphenol A (BPA) and Obesity.” Mol. Cell. Endocrinol 354 (1-2): 74–84.
 Thayer, K. A., and J. J. Heindel, et al. 2012. “Role of Environmental Chemicals in Diabetes and Obesity: A National Toxicology Program Workshop Report.” Environ Health Perspect 120 (6): 779–89.
 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, United States National Institutes of Health. 1998. “Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults—The Evidence Report. National Institutes of Health"Obes. Res. 6 (Suppl 2): 51S–209S.
 Shankar, A., and J.Xiao J, et al. 2011. “Perfluoroalkyl Chemicals and Elevated Serum Uric Acid in U.S. Adults." Clin Epidemiol 3: 251–8.
 Y Wang, et al. 2009. “Meat Consumption Is Associated with Obesity and Central Obesity Among U.S. Adults.” International Journal of Obesity (Lond). 33 (6): 621–28. http://www.nature.com/ijo/index.html.
 Church, T. S., and C. K. Martin, et al. 2009. “Changes in Weight, Waist Circumference and Compensatory Responses with Different Doses of Exercise among Sedentary, Overweight Postmenopausal Women.” PLoS ONE 4 (2): e4515. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004515
 Wang, Z., et al. 2001. “Resting Energy Expenditure: Systematic Organization and Critique of Prediction Methods.” Obesity Research 9 (5): 331–6.
Shelton, Herbert M. 1999. “Hygienic System Vol. II – Orthotrophy.” Health Research Books, February, p. 229. .
 Innes, Emma. 2014. “People Who Live in the Northern Hemisphere Are Fatter 'Because of the Cold Climate.” Dailymail, February.
Feel free to continue browsing